The journal iScience will have a CiteScore round at least 4.50 so the Clarivate impact factor will be round at least 4. Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. This is of course all the way a more than decent impact factor for a young journal.The University of Edinburgh https://www.ed.ac.uk/discovery-brain-sciences/our-staff/postdoc-researchers/Idoia-Quintana-UrzainquiThank you again for your detailed explanation and pointing to a real estimation. Tweets by @ELSpharma
For more information, visit So, either way, researcher from low-income countries are more likely to be negatively affected (i.e., whether they opt for the traditional journals with no APCs or they wish to go for OAs, for which 'costs' might be a hindering factor).Possibility of iScience be an high impact journal is very high due to:However, they need to focus more on quality than quantities. A predatory journal can charge what it wants to - and hopes that the audience is prepared to do so. If authors were offered the option of online-only processing fees versus 'traditional' model open-access fees - which one would they prefer? If you control for all other variables, open-access journal articles are more likely to get cited compared to their 'traditional' subscription-based counterparts, for obvious reasons. Below is a recent list of 2019—2020 articles that have had the most social media attention.
One reason is that a substantial number of journals with high impact factor are not open access journals and you can publish without APC (some charge for colour etc.). Once production of your article has started, you can track the status of your article via The Journal favors publication of full-length papers where modern scientific technologies are used to explain Manuscripts should present novel preclinical findings addressing questions of Four common reasons for rejection include: out of scope (the manuscript does not conform to the goal of identification of mechanisms related to therapy for human disease); too preliminary (manuscript is based on a limited amount of experimental data diminishing significance); lack of novelty (manuscript is well done but does not address a significant question); unidentified structure (actions of biological extracts of unknown chemical composition).
Your datasets will also be searchable on Mendeley Data Search, which includes nearly 11 million indexed datasets. Are there any benefits or downsides of preprinting?How we can know the IMPACT FACTOR of various journals?We all are engaged regularly publishing our research in various reputed journals. Go Discover how our open access options can help you maximize reach and impact
iScience supports interdisciplinary collaboration in all its forms.
The reasoning was a bit like: the Nature Publishing Group and its first open access sister journal Nature Communications (impact factor round 11-12) was a success story. Dear Oshi, I also do not think there is a correlation between the publication charges (submission fee + APC) and quality and/or impact of a journal, in GENERAL. Recently published articles from Life Sciences. Previous Previous post: Journal of Materials NanoScience Impact Factor and Indexing Next Next post: Phytomedicine Journal Special issue on Plant medicine | Biomedical and … For example, I had a rejection in 8 hours, an acceptance in 2 days, a rejection in 9 months, and an acceptance in 18 months. When open access publishing was fledgling, some good journals opted to start their article processing charges (APC) at low to moderate levels and increase the fees gradually. Growth of open access journal publishing in the social sciences and humanities is second o...Many reputable open-access publishers use the “author pays” model to financially support their publishing endeavors. The impact factor should not be used without careful attention to the many phenomena that influence citation rates, as for example the average number of references cited in the average article. Only some of the benefits of publishing open access with ElsevierData for: The PERK/Nrf2 pathway mediates endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced injury by upregulating endoplasmic reticulophagy in H9c2 cardiomyoblastsData for: Effects of MFHAS1 on Cognitive Impairment and Dendritic Pathology in the Hippocampus of Septic RatsData for: Calreticulin stabilizes F-actin by acetylating actin and protects microvascular endothelial cells against microwave radiationGastrointestinal Tract: New Pharmacological TargetsSpecial issue on Environmental Toxicants and Chronic DiseasesSpotlighting the research of 10 women scientists for #InternationalWomensDayCOVID-19: Melatonin as a potential adjuvant treatmentLungs as target of COVID-19 infection: Protective common molecular mechanisms of vitamin D and melatonin as a new potential synergistic treatment
Yes, we went through the same reasoning when we decided to go for it. Some journals belonging to the big names in academic publishing tended to set their fees quite high.This disparity made a section of the academic/ scientific community (names withheld) to erroneously believe that low APCs were a feature of predatory and low quality journals while high APCs were characteristic of high quality, high impact journals.Therefore, the question is: Is the amount of article processing charge an indicator of journal quality?In my opinion, YES.