As far as evidence, that’s not worth much, IMO. It is absolutely corroborated, using forensic techniques and methodology. I’m still very open to the possibility that Friedman, Davis and Alexander are right and Lazar never made it to S-4.I’d like to see Lazar’s friend, (who says he dropped him off at Caltech) Dr. Krangle, Tagliani and any other pro-Lazar witnesses go on camera and tell their stories. Davis calls their stories hearsay because we don’t hear from them directly. He interviews Bob Lazar and Jeremy Corbell.
You should show more deference and respect to them ... Scientists need to get back to using the scientific method to study things that are unknown and unusual, and the UFO subject is one of them. But I fully expect that to change in the near future when they’re done with their commitments related to “Hunt for the Skinwalker” and “Bob Lazar: Area 51 and Flying Saucers.” And when that happens, I’ll update this article or write a another one.After seeing these comments, I reached out to Davis to see if he could add any more thoughts or details about the Lazar story. Important conversations are happening now. And John Alexander said not necessarily but possible, depending on the job. My biggest issue with this is…Why do we have to hear this from Davis and Lear? Back when ‘C2C was a must listen.
The conversation was between Admiral Thomas R. Wilson and physicist Eric W. Davis in a secret meeting held on 16 October 2002. And you may be right about confabulating.I first heard about the Bob Lazar story the first time around in the 80s.If you’re unfamiliar with the story, I encourage you to watch Bob Lazar: Area 51 Flying Saucers, now streaming on Netflix. And I don’t disagree with most of what he has written and said about him.
I’ll know for sure after I see the film.
I just came across it now because there’s a discussion about Lazar again on some of the UFO FB groups. They're definitely the craft of a supremely advanced technology," says physicist Davis, a research physicist at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Austin, studies He's aware of the public perception -- mostly from skeptics and debunkers -- that no legitimate scientists would ever touch the subject of UFOs. I think he’s been fair.
Lazar looked like a physicist? Thanks for the head’s up, Matt.Great article!
Official Statements Astrophysicist Eric Davis, On Working for The Pentagon UFO Program – Interview In this extended interview from Episode 7 of The Basement Office, astrophysicist Eric Davis, Ph.D. is asked about his time investigating UFOs for the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) at the Department of Defense. As director Jeremy Corbell puts it: “These milestones along the way, no matter how much we nitpick it apart, no matter how much people don’t want to believe, the evidence that he’s telling the truth outweighs the evidence that he’s not.”Just found this site.
Not the subject -- they fear the backlash from their professional colleagues. The impact on their career might be detrimental and they'd get bad publicity.
And for me, it’s been very difficult to figure out the truth.
But now, I think I’m at 60/40 in favor of believing him or at least believing that some of the things he’s described as happening at S-4, have actually happened at some point in time. What I would really love to see is a debate or roundtable that includes those three plus Eric Davis, Stanton Friedman and John Alexander. Probably saw this propulsion in action, but 12 UFOs in a hangar is incredible. A report by the New York Times revealed that the team update the US Senate’s Intelligence Committee on its unidentified flying object (UFO) research every six months. That's because UFOs are not a natural phenomenon, and that's what science studies." He wrote this article, “Remember, Dr. Eric Davis’ claims that Lazar’s “job was radiation health monitor which did not require security clearances so he did not get access to Area-51 since his workstation was at the off-site logistics support facility which is unclassified…Lazar never had security clearances to begin with because his A few weeks after Corbell posted his interview with Krangle, Friedman was As I mentioned to Dr. Davis, one of the things that makes me seriously consider the possibility that Lazar is telling the truth has to do with the many witnesses George Knapp has tried to interview about information related to Lazar’s claims. I’ve read most of the material on there. Part of an investigation includes getting the other side. After hearing various interviews with Corbell, I think that’s what he’s going for.
I enjoyed “Corbell and Lazar were on Coast to Coast AM the other night with George Knapp hosting.
Excellent. Lazar has stated that Teller helped him get hired at S-4. I’m no security clearance expert (to put it mildly) but to me, Alexander’s answer makes the most sense.I don’t consider the Krangle story strong evidence that Lazar was a physicist at LANL.
He was also an idiot for telling an idiotic lie about the reasoning that he was using to come to such a conclusion.
Rather I believe he is a confabulator, that he sincerely believes the stories about himself and has no conscious intention to deceive.The most comprehensive critique of Lazar at Area 51 was done 20 years ago by a real physicist.
Teller I want to finish off with this quote for the pro-Lazar folks. Lazar worked as a radiation health monitor in the unsecured logistics contractor facility outside of Area-51, so he was never inside that site, and he never held security clearances because he didn’t need them to work in an unclassified area.