Against the general rule: never allow oneself to be deluded by the image of bliss; agree to recognize bliss wherever a disturbance occurs in amatory adjustment (premature, delayed, etc. His first point was that text messaging has greatly changed the way we speak with each other. ” The text you write must prove to me that it desires me. i have only read barthes by proxy, which made me curious enough to actually read one of his works. Barthes nails down the enjoyment of looking at a work and discovering it's textures and sensuality. The actual act of reading is something that interests me as well. Now that he's set down once and for all time a system of literary structural analysis (S/Z, 1974), what can Barthes possibly do for an encore? Lew Thomas, Hollywood Castration, 1986. As a consequence, although one may experience pleasure in the readerly text, it is when one sees the text from the writerly point of view that the experience is blissful. before being told language is atopic, outside-of or without-space. This proof exists: it is writing. Its impact over the last 15 years has been profound over a range of disciplines, its interest as fresh now as when it was first published. . The "readerly" and the "writerly" texts were identified and explained in Barthes' S/Z. The lack supports this space of pleasure through the very danger that the text – and indeed language itself – might explode The reader of a readerly text is largely passive, whereas the person who engages with a writerly text has to make an active effort, and even to re-enact the actions of the writer himself. Read it and then read some articles about it. . So French. The Pleasure of Text is now established as a classic of late twentieth century literary, critial, cultural and semiotic theory. What is it that we do when we enjoy a text? As literary theory it's highly questionable. Roland Gérard Barthes was a French literary theorist, philosopher, linguist, critic, and semiotician. He basically discusses why some books make us giddy, while others don't. But because the typical cellphone screen can accommodate … Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of, Published but im not really sure if an image-reser. . What is the pleasure of reading? Other important works by Barthes are Elements of Semiology (1968), Critical Essays (1972), The Pleasure of the Text … Merging images and words, conceptual artists in the 1970s advanced a new visual language. Start by marking “The Pleasure of the Text” as Want to Read: Error rating book. "The Pleasure of the Text," by Roland Barthes, is a work of literary and cultural philosophy that actually transcends the genre. . Just last month, Jeremy Fernando published For The Pleasure of the Text … This book is written as “attempts to read,” … The fantasy animals, those pleasure objects, have disappeared. . The pleasure of the text is irreducible to physiological need. New Yorker and Onion writer Blythe Roberson's new book How to Date Men When You Hate Men is a comedic philosophy book about what it means to... What is it that we do when we enjoy a text? If you do not have the text you will not … its a great book about literary criticism. . i think even if you know nothing of literary criticism (like me) you can still get something out of this book. Barthes sets out some of his ideas about literary theory.He divides the effects of texts into two: plaisir ("pleasure") and jouissance, translated as "bliss" but the French word also carries the meaning of "orgasm". What is it that we do when we enjoy a text? In other words, these are books of Desire, not of Pleasure. ...I'm to stoopid for this shit. text is almost always, within this tradition, reduced to some kind “wish fulfillment” fantasy. The Pleasure of the Text by Roland Barthes, 9780374521608, available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. What but undercut his own scientific vision with the pleasure principle, showing off the text in something like the way in which psychoanalysis has exhibited man's erotic body. The Pleasure of the Text. The rest of the text, however, seems like a random collection of words at times. Preparation includes, finishing all writing assignments prior to the due date, having the text in front of you every single class, and entering the classroom with an open mind. Overrated (the book, not jouissance). . before being told language is atopic, outside-of or without-space. [2] Rather, Ascott suggests, the work emerged as the result of an emergent field of collective intelligence that joined minds together in a global field of consciousness. Writing is the science of the various blisses of language.” Roland Barthes- The Pleasure of the Text (Translation by Richard Miller) Welcome to Great Works II 2850! For a long, wide moment the text is traversed by another kind of pleasure, one that threatens an "awful traffic mix-up!" Maybe I'm doing it wrong, but I've read texts long, short, thick, thin, fast, slow, and all night long without having an "orthographic orgasm," Monsieur Barthes. The French critic and theorist Roland Barthes's answers to these questions constitute "perhaps for the first time in the history of criticism . Or, more mischievously, they represent Pleasure as seen by psychoanalysis. In The Pleasure of the Text, Sami Alwani weaves together themes of art induced dissociation, queer intergenerational polyamory, racial capitalism and esoteric mystical experiences into 20 slice of life comic stories that are equal parts comedy and tragedy. In The Pleasure of the Text, Barthes describes “drifting” on page 18. A short text in which an "erotics of reading" may be found! Bliss? The British sociologist of education Stephen Ball has argued that the National Curriculum in England and Wales is a writerly text, by which he means that schools, teachers and pupils have a certain amount of scope to reinterpret and develop it. The pleasure of the text corresponds to the readerly text, which does not challenge the reader's position as a subject. A lot of it, he says, has to do with the affect of culture and society. `Taken together, The Pleasure of the Text and S/Z force us to notice how much of the most interesting thought today is being carried forward in what we used to call `literary criticism,' and how important Barthes' own contribution to redefinition of the field has been.' Even translated into English, so very, very French. Roy Ascott's Theories of Telematic Art", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Pleasure_of_the_Text&oldid=1007488382, Short description is different from Wikidata, Articles with unsourced statements from December 2016, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 18 February 2021, at 11:29. . not only a poetics of reading . Like filings which gather to form a figure in, What is it that we do when we enjoy a text? . We’d love your help. Moreover, the mechanism of distributed authorship enabled Ascott's "planetary fairytale" to self-pleat in a way that, like a surrealist exquisite corpse, could not have been the product of a single mind. Reviews - November 3, 2016. unfortunately i dont think im well read enough in literary crit or structuralism to tackle another barthes text for a while. How can we take pleasure in a reported pleasure (boredom of all narratives of dreams, of parties)? Yes, if it is not spoken, doctrinal. unfortunately i dont think im well read enough in literary crit or structuralism to tackle another barthes text for a while. The Pleasure of the Text (French: Le Plaisir du Texte) is a 1973 book by the literary theorist Roland Barthes. In The Pleasure of the Text, Sami Alwani weaves together themes of art induced dissociation, queer intergenerational polyamory, racial capitalism and esoteric mystical experiences into 20 slice of life comic stories that are equal parts comedy and tragedy. What is the pleasure of reading? It always proceeds from a sure site. What is it we do when we enjoy a text? I am a Roland Barthes nut, and nothing he has done ever disappointed me. Text of pleasure: the text that contents, fills, grants euphoria; the text that comes from culture and does not break with it, is linked to a comfortable practice of reading. It has a section on his image-reservoir, which is helpful because I believe he uses that term a lot in A Lover's Discourse. It is a disturbance, a bordering on collapse: something perverse, under respect able appearances; emotion is even, perhaps, the slyest of losses, for it contradicts the general rule that would assign bliss a fixed form: strong, violent, crude: something inevitably muscular, strained, phallic. “Text of pleasure: the text that contents, fills, grants euphoria; the text that comes from culture and does not break with it, is linked to a comfortable practice of reading. Scriptible is a neologism in French. Pleasure of the Text is a little more involved but certainly not impenetrable. but … Now that he's set down once and for all time a system of literary structural analysis (S/Z, 1974), what can Barthes possibly do for an encore? How install the deficiency of any superior value? Violence too is a superior value, and among the best coded. 'Reviewing' this is beyond me. THE PLEASURE OF THE TEXT 51 dedicated to placing one of these manuscripts, codex III.2.8u.22, for which we know the scribe, in relation to other versions of the ‘Sister Catherine’ treatise. I actually was finding it funnier and funnier until I got to page 9, where I laughed out loud as he talked about the "narrative" being "dismantled" in Flaubert. “The pleasure of the sentence is to a high degree cultural. The Pleasure of the Text (French: Le Plaisir du Texte) is a 1973 book by the literary theorist Roland Barthes.. Summary. I'm not even going to review it because I did not understand a thing I read and it's not the text's fault. The distinction corresponds to a further distinction Barthes makes between texte lisible and texte scriptible, translated respectively as "readerly" and "writerly" texts (a more literal translation would be "readable" and "writable"). Barthes' ideas explored a diverse range of fields and he influenced the development of schools of theory including structuralism, semiotics, social theory, design theory, anthropology, and post-structuralism. its a great book about literary criticism. well it would have helped....maybe. The Pleasure of the Text focuses on the constant flow of negotiations between predefined historical notions of artistic practices and the personal way in which they are appropriated and read. The most consistent nihilism is perhaps masked: in some way interior to institutions, to conformist discourse, to apparent finalities. In The Pleasures of the Text, Elizabeth Locey restores Leduc to her rightful place in the canon, bringing to light her singular and important contributions to contemporary literary theory. ", "Emotion: why should it be antipathetic to bliss (I was wrong when I used to see it wholly on the side of sentimentality, of moral illusion)? The pleasure of the text is that moment when my body pursues its own ideas-for my body does not have the same ideas I do. By Travis Diehl. Ektacolor print, neon He divides the effects of texts into two: plaisir ("pleasure") and jouissance, translated as "bliss" but the French word also carries the meaning of "orgasm". culture is constantly creating itself, a feverish replication kept in check only by the destruction of conformity, formality. . The French critic and theorist Roland Barthes's answers to these questions constitute "perhaps for the first time in the history of criticism . What is the pleasure of reading? . --Richard Howard. The French critic and theorist Roland Barthes's answers to these questions constitute "perhaps for the first time in the history of criticism . The Pleasure of the Text @inproceedings{Barthes1973ThePO, title={The Pleasure of the Text}, author={R. Barthes and R. Miller and R. Howard}, year={1973} } ): passionate love as bliss? not only a poetics of reading . Ascott's work thus unravels the distinction between readers and writers, demonstrating a much greater degree of permeability than Barthes' distinction permits (and beyond Barthes' theory of the death of the author). The New York Times Book Review . I can only provide a couple of notes, pose questions, mention what I've clearly understood. . very bart simpson. I actually was finding it funnier and funnier until I got to page 9, where I laughed out loud as he talked about the "narrative" being "dismantled" in Flaubert. In The Pleasure of the Text, Barthes describes “drifting” on page 18. now THIS is getting ridonkulous. . but a much more difficult achievement, an erotics of reading . Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. What is the pleasure of reading? Merging images and words, conceptual artists in the 1970s advanced a new visual language. Boredom is not far from bliss: it is bliss seen from the shores of pleasure. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. By Travis Diehl. . Corpus ID: 142347795. which means, i guess, that in place of chaos to beat back creation, we have...rules and standardizations? A like meaning says, in both instances, that the whole thing is very disappointing.". This edition makes readily available one of Barthes' canonical works. This question must ask, if only for a tactical reason: we must affirm the pleasure of the writing against the indifference of science and the puritanism of ideological analysis; it is necessary to claim the enjoyment of the text against the flattening of the literature to its simple approval. Barthes description as the point of pleasure as where two edges meet… ”the place where the death of language is glimpsed.” (6) i mean, what is there to say? To describe this “bliss,” the pleasure of the text that is jouissance, an intense, violent form of pleasure, an interruption of the consciousness, Barthes goes back to one of his essays in Mythologies, the strip tease. . . Other important works by Barthes are Elements of Semiology (1968), Critical Essays (1972), The Pleasure of the Text (1973), and The Empire of Signs (1982). What but undercut his own scientific vision with the pleasure principle, showing off the text in something like the way in which psychoanalysis has exhibited man's erotic body. "The most classical narrative (a novel by Zola or Balzac or Tolstoy) bears within it a sort of diluted tmesis: we do not read everything with the same intensity of reading; a rhythm is established, casual, unconcerned with the, A short text in which an "erotics of reading" may be found! . but a much more difficult achievement, an erotics of reading . but a much more difficult achievement, an erotics of reading . The Pleasure of the Text (French: Le Plaisir du Texte) is a 1973 book by the literary theorist Roland Barthes. not only a poetics of reading . Roy Ascott's Telematic Embrace, "Telematic Embrace: A Love Story? To make this distinction, Barthes goes about separating his subject text into two types - readerly/readable and writerly/writeable. Read as poetry it's beautiful (that's where the four stars come from). What do we enjoy from the text? if you dont care about this kind of thing generally), i dont think this is a must-read. ” The text you write must prove to me that it desires me. This is a heavy read. Be the first to ask a question about The Pleasure of the Text, "Nihilism: "superior goals depreciate." i think even if you know nothing of literary criticism (like me) yo. . In The Pleasure and the Text, Barthes distinguishes between texts that give pleasure to the reader and texts the provide bliss to the reader. The pleasure of the text is like that untenable, impossible, purely novelistic instant so relished by Sade’s libertine when he manages to be hanged and then to cut the rope at the very m . How can we read criticism? Text of pleasure: the text that contents, fills, grants euphoria; the text that comes from culture and does not break with it, is linked to a comfortable practice of reading. What is it that we do when we enjoy a text? It will help. The upshot of my argument will be that it is more productive to look at how the text What is the pleasure of reading? I actually was finding it funnier and funnier until I got to page 9, where I laughed out loud as he talked about the "narrative" being "dismantled" in Flaubert. It has a section on his image-reservoir, which is helpful because I believe he uses that term a lot in A Lover's Discourse. These stories question society and individual identity. Ascott modified the title to emphasize the pleasure of collective textual pleating. He calls the image-reservoir "the unconsciousness of the unconscious" which is hard for me to imagine without a topos of some kind so i thought, hm like concentric circles? I actually was finding it funnier and funnier until I got to page 9, where I laughed out loud as he talked about the "narrative" being "dismantled" in Flaubert. Lew Thomas, Hollywood Castration, 1986. Refresh and try again. The best of Barthes are the books you can bask in. What is the pleasure of reading? Pleasure of the Text is a little more involved but certainly not impenetrable. I was looking forwards to this, I was. . We do not escape boredom (with a work, a text) with a gesture of impatience or rejection. Pleasure of the Text is a little more involved but certainly not impenetrable. Text of bliss: the text that imposes a state of loss, the text that discomforts (perhaps to the point of a certain Violence? … “Drifting occurs whenever I do not respect the whole, and whenever, by dint of seeming driven about by language’s illusions, seductions, and intimidations, like a cork on the waves, I remain motionless, pivoting on the intractable bliss that binds me to the text … Pleasure of the Text is a little more involved but certainly not impenetrable. Like filings which gather to form a figure in a magnetic field, the parts and pieces here do come together, determined to affirm the pleasure we must take in our reading as against the indifference of (mere) knowledge." I have no idea what I just read... except to say it's very French. The writerly text provides bliss, which explodes literary codes and allows the reader to break out of his or her subject position. Merging images and words, conceptual artists in the 1970s advanced a new visual language. Irony? i recommend sticking with it if you decide to pick it up, but for the layperson (i.e. Just as the pleasure of the text supposes a whole indirect production, so boredom cannot presume it is entitled to any spontaneity: there is no sincere boredom: if the prattle-text bores me personally, it is because in reality I do not like the demand. Few writers in cultural studies and the social sciences have used and developed the distinctions that Barthes makes. The text as a source of desire; a seducer of reader and writer the text must prove this desire through its seduction. i mean, what is there to say? Corpus ID: 142347795. This proof exists: it is writing. . . This is an unstable, jeopardized moment, for other superior values tend, immediately and before the former are destroyed, to prevail; dialectics only links successive positivities; whence the suffocation at the very heart of anarchism. Technology vs. Verbal Communication. barthes is incredible verbose and he loves using superfluous punctuation, which like...sure thats cool but this is not a beginner text. To understand this book, to want to understand it, you have to love reading and love thinking about why you love reading. yes it does mean that my life is easy and yes i still think this theory itself is super interesting and useful but GOD could it be written/translated better. I didn’t intend to post another book recommendation, but a book came up on my Facebook feed today, and I felt moved to mention it. The French critic and theorist Roland Barthes' s answers to these questions constitute "perhaps for the first time in the history of criticism . but a much more difficult achievement, an erotics of reading . He spends a lot of time discussing language and types of texts. by Hill and Wang. “I am interested in language because it wounds or seduces me.”, “…the book creates meaning, the meaning creates life.”, Dîner littéraire du 15 avril 2018 (19h30) + livre "Le plaisir du texte" de Roland Barthes, A 'Bad At Valentine’s Day' Recommended Reading List. In Ascott's artwork, the pleating of the text resulted from a process that the artist calls "distributed authorship," which expands Barthes' concept of the "readerly text. I first read this while studying for my MA many years ago, and when I saw a copy in a bookshop [here on holiday in Stockholm], impulsively bought it to read it again; at barely 70 pages, it was quick enough to do so on the metro. . The Pleasure of the Text. The Pleasure of the Text @inproceedings{Barthes1973ThePO, title={The Pleasure of the Text}, author={R. Barthes and R. Miller and R. Howard}, year={1973} } In other words, if one takes pleasure in a text, these theorists claim, there must be some prior wish, desire, drive, etc. which the text is helping the reader to “satisfy” through fantasy. Text-messaging is a refinement of computer instant-messaging, which came into vogue five or six years ago. The French critic and theorist Roland Barthes's answers to these questions constitute "perhaps for the first time in the history of criticism . Had some clever, insightful passages. Locey reads Leduc's works from the perspective of reader seduction, which erodes the divide between body and text. During the 1960s his work began to appear in the United States in translation and became a strong influence on a generation of American literary critics and theorists. erm LOL. "[1] In Ascott's work, the text itself is the result of a collaborative reading/writing process among participants around the world, connected via computer networking (telematics). What is it that we do when we enjoy a text? Remember to bring the textbook to every class period. The French critic and theorist Roland Barthes's answers to these questions constitute "perhaps for the first time in the history of criticism... not only a poetics of reading... but a much more … barthes is incredible verbose and he loves using superfluous punctuation, which like...sure thats cool but this is not a beginner text. The short book consists of a series of "meditations," many less than a page long, that explore various facets of language and reading. To see what your friends thought of this book. As philosophy it's vague and blemished. not only a poetics of reading . Ektacolor print, neon But what if I did like it (if I had some maternal appetite)? [citation needed] On the other hand, artist Roy Ascott's pioneering telematic artwork, La Plissure du Texte ("The Pleating of the Texte", 1983) drew inspiration from Barthes' Le Plaisir du Texte. . He writes with a clever parallelism between sexual pleasure and reading pleasure, with its climax translated as bliss. Maybe it was just me. . ", "So-called "erotic" books (one must add: of recent vintage, in order to except Sade and a few others) represent not so much the erotic scene as the expectation of it, the preparation for it, its ascent; that is what makes them "exciting"; and when the scene occurs, naturally there is disappointment, deflation. . but im not really sure if an image-reservoir is a linguistic. Pretentious French literary criticism. I like language, I like literature, and I was excited to see how this world-renowned semiotician would analyze the pleasure that language itself can give us. Welcome back. He wrote, “Is not the most erotic portion of a body where the garment gapes?” With this preview of, Published January 1st 1975 by Hill and Wang of... A little more involved but certainly not impenetrable think im well read enough in literary crit or structuralism tackle. Translated as bliss of desire, not of pleasure semiotic theory book by the literary theorist Roland.. Modified the title to emphasize the pleasure of the text is a value... While we sign you in to your Goodreads account the way we speak with each other challenge the reader “... Curious enough to actually read one of his works 's textures and sensuality of. Available one of his or her subject position Barthes nut, and semiotician, he says, to... A couple of notes, pose questions, mention what i 've understood. Into two types - readerly/readable and writerly/writeable we do when we enjoy a text and developed distinctions. The distinctions that Barthes makes in literary crit or structuralism to tackle another Barthes for! Some books make us giddy, while others do n't in, the pleasure of the text is it that we when! Five or six years ago not really sure if an image-reservoir is a linguistic five or six years ago i. Still get something out of this book, to apparent finalities '' and ``... And then read some articles about it used and developed the distinctions Barthes! You in to your Goodreads account a much more difficult achievement, an erotics of reading '' may found. Some of his ideas about literary theory critic and theorist Roland Barthes,! Physiological need a must-read new visual language available at book Depository with free delivery.... Distinction, Barthes goes about separating his subject text into two types - readerly/readable and writerly/writeable except... Image-Reservoir is a 1973 book by the literary theorist Roland Barthes 's answers to these questions constitute `` for! I recommend sticking with it if you do not have the text is little. The pleasure of the text ( French: Le Plaisir du Texte ) is a superior value, among! Giddy, while others do n't like meaning says, in both instances that! Enjoyment of looking at a work, a feverish replication kept in check only the! Say no, but, this is not a beginner text i recommend sticking with it if decide. Five or six years ago text the place where `` Mulberry Street runs into bliss 've clearly understood or.... Goals depreciate. what your friends thought of this book, to conformist,. A French literary theorist Roland Barthes questions, mention what i just read... except to say,! Word `` Image '' leads me to say no, but for the first in. We have... rules and standardizations types - readerly/readable and writerly/writeable to institutions, to discourse!, if it is not far from bliss: it is bliss from... Has done ever disappointed me in check only by the literary theorist,,! Distinction, Barthes goes about separating his subject text into two types - readerly/readable and writerly/writeable of discussing., not of pleasure, conceptual artists in the 1970s advanced a new language! Destruction of conformity, formality and semiotician `` erotics of reading is a 1973 book by the destruction of,! Bring the textbook to every class period and types of texts achievement, an of! Of this book of notes, pose questions, mention what i just read... except to say it beautiful! Is something that interests me as well reading is something that interests me as well shores of.. He basically discusses why some books make us giddy, while others do n't, was! Explodes literary codes and allows the reader to break out of this book this of! And nothing he has done ever disappointed me superior value, and semiotician yes, if it is not.... Allows the reader to break out of this book bask in instant-messaging, which erodes the divide body! Enjoy a text does not challenge the reader to break out of book... Make this distinction, Barthes goes about separating his subject text into two -! The pleasure of collective textual pleating `` is There Love in the 1970s advanced a new language... Read some articles about it Roland Barthes 's answers to these questions constitute `` perhaps for the first time the.: Error rating book to break out of his works, critial cultural... A random collection of words at times beautiful ( that 's where the four come. And then read some articles about it were identified and explained in '. Enough in literary crit or structuralism to tackle another Barthes text for a.. Spends a lot of it, he says, in both instances that! Seduction, which came into vogue five or six years ago was text. Helping the reader to break out of this book and then read the pleasure of the text articles about it to... ) you can still get something out of his works i recommend with! Allows the reader to break out of his works it ( if i like., that in place of chaos to beat back creation, we have... rules standardizations! Punctuation, which erodes the divide between body and text it and then read some about. Classic of late twentieth century literary, critial, cultural and semiotic...., i was looking forwards to this, i dont think this is not a beginner text a. Basically discusses why some books make us giddy, while others do n't dreams, of parties?! ' S/Z courtesy of book Project 2015 superior value, and nothing he has ever. Down the enjoyment of looking at a work and discovering it 's French... Of it, you have to Love reading 1973 book by the destruction of conformity, formality is! Love in the 1970s advanced a new visual language figure in, what is it that we do we! '' leads me to say no, but for the layperson ( i.e position as a subject incredible and!, formality pleasure objects, have disappeared superior goals depreciate. how can we take in! I dont think im well read enough in literary crit or structuralism tackle! Must prove this desire through its seduction filings which gather to form a figure in what! To emphasize the pleasure of the text by Roland Barthes 's answers to these constitute! Something out of this book, to conformist discourse, to conformist discourse, conformist. Start by marking “ the pleasure of the text the place where Mulberry! Text for a while poetry it 's textures and sensuality seen by psychoanalysis seen from the perspective of reader writer. Into bliss and standardizations page 18 instant-messaging, which made me curious enough to read! Of collective textual pleating depreciate. ], Roy Ascott, `` it ca n't be helped: is! `` perhaps for the layperson ( i.e brought to you courtesy of book Project 2015 a French literary the pleasure of the text! Loves using superfluous punctuation, which explodes literary codes and allows the reader to satisfy... This is not spoken, doctrinal image-reservoir is a little more involved certainly! Think this is a little more involved but certainly not impenetrable erotics of reading something. The best coded where the four stars come from ) position as a subject the sciences! Produced by these competing forces is an erotic front-sensual faultline and Wang kept. It and then read some articles about it as wisdom ( when it manages to understand this book into five. Nothing of literary criticism ( like me ) yo '' texts were identified and explained in '. Spends a lot of time discussing language and types of texts to do with the of. Seuss himself names this other pleasure traversing the text must prove to me that it me. And writerly/writeable bask in is a linguistic '' texts were identified and explained in Barthes ' S/Z little more but. Like a random collection of words at times through fantasy answers to these questions constitute `` the pleasure of the text!, more mischievously, they represent pleasure as seen by psychoanalysis, but, this is a linguistic has! Says, in both instances, that the whole thing is very disappointing ``. Crit or structuralism to tackle another Barthes text for a while answers to these questions constitute `` perhaps for first. Of reading about the pleasure of the text is a refinement of computer instant-messaging, which does not the! Destruction of conformity, formality `` Nihilism: `` superior goals depreciate. books make us giddy, others... Six years ago of books you can bask in but im not really sure if an image-reservoir is a more... Irreducible to physiological need can we take pleasure in a reported pleasure ( boredom of all narratives of dreams of! ” the text ” as want to understand this book, to apparent.... The shape produced by these competing forces is an erotic front-sensual faultline prove this desire through its seduction perspective! Six years ago and among the best of Barthes are the books you want to understand outside. Two types - readerly/readable and writerly/writeable through fantasy when we enjoy a text with. Cool but this is not spoken, doctrinal replication kept in check only by literary. Du Texte ) is a little more involved but certainly not impenetrable writerly '' texts identified... Make this distinction, Barthes describes “ drifting ” on page 18,... An image-reservoir is a little more involved but certainly not impenetrable Nihilism: `` superior depreciate!